1. Medicinal Chemistry of σ1 Receptor Ligands: Pharmacophore Models, Synthesis, Structure Affinity Relationships, and Pharmacological Applications
Frauke Weber, Bernhard Wünsch Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;244:51-79. doi: 10.1007/164_2017_33.
In the first part of this chapter, we summarize the various pharmacophore models for σ1 receptor ligands. Common to all of them is a basic amine flanked by two hydrophobic regions, representing the pharmacophoric elements. The development of computer-based models like the 3D homology model is described as well as the first crystal structure of the σ1 receptor. The second part focuses on the synthesis and biological properties of different σ1 receptor ligands, identified as 1-9. Monocyclic piperazines 1 and bicyclic piperazines 2 and 3 were developed as cytotoxic compounds, thus the IC50 values of cell growth and survival inhibition studies are given for all derivatives. The mechanism of cell survival inhibition, induction of time-dependent apoptosis, of compound ent-2a is discussed. Experimentally determined σ1 affinity shows good correlation with the results from molecular dynamics simulations based on a 3D homology model. Spirocyclic compounds 4 and 5 represent well-established σ1 receptor ligands. The homologous fluoroalkyl derivatives 4 have favorable pharmacological properties for use as fluorinated PET tracers. The (S)-configured fluoroethyl substituted compound (S)-4b is under investigation as PET tracer for imaging of σ1 receptors in the brain of patients affected by major depression. 1,3-Dioxanes 6c and 6d display a very potent σ1 antagonist profile and the racemic 1,3-dioxane 6c has high anti-allodynic activity at low doses. The arylpropenylamines 7 are very potent σ1 receptor ligands with high σ1/σ2 selectivity. The top compound 7g acts as an agonist as defined by its ability to potentiate neurite outgrowth at low concentrations. Among the morpholinoethoxypyrazoles 8, 8c (known as S1RA) reveals the most promising pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties. Due to its good safety profile, 8c is currently being investigated in a phase II clinical trial for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The most potent ligand 9e of 3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolones 9 shows promising anti-nociceptive activity in the formalin test.
2. Scouting new sigma receptor ligands: Synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and molecular modeling of 1,3-dioxolane-based structures and derivatives
Silvia Franchini, et al. Eur J Med Chem. 2016 Apr 13;112:1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.01.059. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
Herein we report the synthesis and biological activity of new sigma receptor (σR) ligands obtained by combining different substituted five-membered heterocyclic rings with appropriate σR pharmacophoric amines. Radioligand binding assay, performed on guinea pig brain membranes, identified 25b (1-(1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-ylmethyl)-4-benzylpiperazine) as the most interesting compound of the series, displaying high affinity and selectivity for σ1R (pKiσ1 = 9.13; σ1/σ2 = 47). The ability of 25b to modulate the analgesic effect of the κ agonist (-)-U-50,488H and μ agonist morphine was evaluated in vivo by radiant heat tail-flick test. It exhibited anti-opioid effects on both κ and μ receptor-mediated analgesia, suggesting an agonistic behavior at σ1R. Docking studies were performed on the theoretical σ1R homology model. The present work represents a new starting point for the design of more potent and selective σ1R ligands.
3. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of 2,6-disubstituted tetrahydropyrans with high σ1 receptor affinity, antitumor and analgesic activity
Nicole Kopp, et al. Eur J Med Chem. 2021 Jul 5;219:113443. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113443. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
1,3-Dioxanes 1 and cyclohexanes 2 bearing a phenyl ring and an aminoethyl moiety in 1,3-relationship to each other represent highly potent σ1 receptor antagonists. In order to increase the chemical stability of the acetalic 1,3-dioxanes 1 and the polarity of the cyclohexanes 2, tetrahydropyran derivatives 3 equipped with the same substituents were designed, synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated. The key step of the synthesis was a lipase-catalyzed enantioselective acetylation of the alcohol (R)-5 leading finally to enantiomerically pure test compounds 3a-g. With respect to σ1 receptor affinity and selectivity over a broad range of related (σ2, PCP binding site) and further targets, the enantiomeric benzylamines 3a and cyclohexylmethylamines 3b represent the most promising drug candidates of this series. However, the eudismic ratio for σ1 binding is only in the range of 2.5-3.3. Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations confirmed the same binding pose for both the tetrahydropyran 3 and cyclohexane derivatives 2 at the σ1 receptor, according to which: i) the protonated amino moiety of (2S,6R)-3a engages the same key polar interactions with Glu172 (ionic) and Phe107 (π-cation), ii) the lipophilic parts of (2S,6R)-3a are hosted in three hydrophobic regions of the σ1 receptor, and iii) the O-atom of the tetrahydropyran derivatives 3 does not show a relevant interaction with the σ1 receptor. Further in silico evidences obtained by the application of free energy perturbation and steered MD techniques fully supported the experimentally observed difference in receptor/ligand affinities. Tetrahydropyrans 3 require a lower dissociative force peak than cyclohexane analogs 2. Enantiomeric benzylamines 3a and cyclohexylmethylamines 3b were able to inhibit the growth of the androgen negative human prostate cancer cell line DU145. The cyclohexylmethylamine (2S,6R)-3b showed the highest σ1 affinity (Ki(σ1) = 0.95 nM) and the highest analgesic activity in vivo (67%).
